Author Topic: The first Pagoda 230SL?  (Read 37602 times)

mdsalemi

  • Pagoda SL Board
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • USA, NC, Davidson
  • Posts: 6653
Re: The first Pagoda 230SL?
« Reply #50 on: April 18, 2012, 18:57:49 »
The letter is great--clearly an old fashioned "carbon copy" Gene made as he typed the letter.  BTW, you young ones, that what CC stands for on an email; a copy made with carbon paper.  If you don't know what that is, look it up!

Anyway I love Gene's astute observations of various and sundry details of driving the car--and the tone was that he felt obligated to provide this information to the Chief engineer.

You should post it here...everyone will see that diving under braking has been an issue since day 1...among other things.
Michael Salemi
Davidson, North Carolina (Charlotte Area) USA
1969 280SL (USA-Spec)
Signal Red 568G w/Black Leather (Restored)
2023 Ford Maverick Lariat Hybrid "Area 51"
2022 Ford Escape Hybrid
2023 Ford Escape Hybrid

114015

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • Germany, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Tecklenburg
  • Posts: 2075
Dear Stich,

Yes, good to hear from you again.
Please post it. That is very well interesting.
In fact there is a lot of information vague on the very early ones. ???
The car (of your friend) you described has some very untypical features that the ... sorry to say so ... "usual late 230ies - 280ies owners" (don't want to hurt anyone here, of course)  just don't see and don't recognize because they have never heard of.

Very early 230ies are indeed very special and have tons of little details different even from late 1963 or early '64 cars. I have seen in the flesh a bunch of these cars including VIN 000001, 000004, 000020, 000024 and pictures of others and all of these had very little things different from each other. Of course, seeing these differences makes it mandatory to exclude these "all new" parts of these cars which turn them today into "as new" or otherwise "better items for sale".

Most differences match with what the "Engelen" (our Pagoda's bible) lists and what (the same good reference) the early parts book can tell (and confirm to) you.
For instance, the pics of the fuel injection pump indicates it is in fact quite different from the usual serial production type, the PES6KL70/12R11. However, your pics match perfectly with some very rare factory (prototype) M127II engine's FI pump  :o 8) ; the details there and with your friend's car are identical.  ;D

As to the dipstick differences Dan mentioned (seven) years ago. Yes, that's true as well.
Theoretically, it could have been something was replaced here - either the oil pan alone or perhaps the whole engine.... and only the "early-number-tag" was moved over to the "later" engine.
All of that is theory of course, but nobody of us knows what - perhaps happened in 1969 or 1974 to this unique car... :o

So, please keep up with the stories and period artefacts; they are all extremely helpful and  - basically very slowly fill up a puzzle on which many pieces are still missing or forgotten of a car (or cars) almost half a century old.

And ah, by the way (to the sceptics here).... VIN 000001 has engine number 000002 - in real _and_ on its data card.  8)

But, in order to finish up here: a ton of more information of this special car is necessary! At least 70 - 100 pictures of the details. Then we can tell you here already muuuuch more ...!  ;) :D ;D


Achim
(earliest 230 admirer)
Achim
(Germany)

twistedtree

  • Associate Member
  • Gold
  • *****
  • USA, MA, Gloucester
  • Posts: 618
Re: The first Pagoda 230SL?
« Reply #52 on: April 19, 2012, 00:16:45 »
Can you post it here?
Peter Hayden
1964 MB 230SL
1970 MB 280SL
2011 BMW 550xi

stitchmon

  • Guest
Re: The first Pagoda 230SL?
« Reply #53 on: July 05, 2012, 03:33:17 »
Here's the letter from Gene to a R. Uhlenhalt in July of 1964.

rmmchl

  • Full Member
  • Silver
  • ****
  • USA, WV, Charleston
  • Posts: 470
Re: The first Pagoda 230SL?
« Reply #54 on: July 10, 2012, 01:31:34 »
wow! I'm getting confused. Is it or isn't it the first one?
« Last Edit: July 11, 2012, 01:53:35 by rmmchl »
michael romeo           
1967  250sl
signal red

114015

  • Full Member
  • Platinum
  • ******
  • Germany, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Tecklenburg
  • Posts: 2075
Re: The first Pagoda 230SL?
« Reply #55 on: July 10, 2012, 13:57:09 »
Quote
I'm getting confused. It is or isn't it the first one?


Not the first one but one of the first prototypes ...

The absolute "first" ones were the non-drivable wood-and-plaster ones made by the Daimer-Benz Styling Department from 1957 on.

Drivable prototypes were perhaps built from 1961/1962 on. No reliable info is so far available as to how many prototypes MB made.

The first (pre-)production car is 113042-10-000001 which was built in March 1963 and was presented on the Geneva Show.
This car is still alive - and still has its original engine 127.981-10-000002.

 ;) ;)
Achim
Achim
(Germany)