I have heard it is not good to start the car unless you will drive it and get everything fully warmed up under load.
Now, that being said, I would like to hear what the experts say about all this.
If you run your engine as you describe, I realize the transmission and rear end are not doing any work, but isn't the engine fully warmed up if enough time goes by?
I've heard that idling allows acids to build up in the oil and I believe, as it cools, moisture condenses in the oil or in the engine. And, on some cars, idling doesn't get the oil hot enough to evaporate off the moisture (although these cars seem to get right up to temperature). But, if we are varying the RPMs, aren't we in fact sucking vapors out the valve cover, which is the intent of the vent at the top (I believe); To pull off these acids (and moisture) that come out as a byproduct of the engine running?
Having said all that. Maybe there is also no good reason to start the engine for a 3 to 5 month hibernation ....... except I like the idea of moving the fuel around.
If it is true that we should not run the engine unless we are driving it (to full operating temperature), then what do you think of this?
Simply once a month or so (once a week if you must), just turn on the fuel pump for 30 or 45 seconds to get the fuel circulating through the system and get fresh fuel in the pump, FIP, lines, etc???
What do you all think? How much of this is stuff that I erroneously learned as an eighteen year old and never re-learned as I go older?