Pagoda SL Group

W113 Pagoda SL Group => Wanted To Buy => Topic started by: db180 on June 20, 2019, 15:57:35

Title: Automatic Gearbox check valve breaking
Post by: db180 on June 20, 2019, 15:57:35

Hi,

I'm looking for a Automatic Gearbox check valve - A11227701389, current one has been discovered as damaged on my 250sl and needs replacing.

Any help locating one would be greatly appreciated.

Regards,

DB180

Title: Re: Automatic Gearbox check valve breaking
Post by: ja17 on June 20, 2019, 20:40:44

So you have a picture?

Title: Re: Automatic Gearbox check valve breaking
Post by: stickandrudderman on June 21, 2019, 14:07:08

Too many digits in that part number.

Title: Re: Automatic Gearbox check valve breaking
Post by: db180 on June 21, 2019, 20:58:32

Hi Joe - unfortunately don't have a picture - gearbox is at the shop. Colin thanks for pointing out the invalid part number it's A1122701389

It's item 198 in the diagram.

Thanks.

Title: Re: Automatic Gearbox check valve breaking
Post by: Shvegel on June 23, 2019, 21:46:07

Drop the “A” and do a google search.  It is shown as available from Mercedes in the US for about 90USD.

Title: Re: Automatic Gearbox check valve breaking
Post by: db180 on June 24, 2019, 08:39:58

It's not available from Germany - I did try ringing Pelican and they checked and said it was also NLA in USA

Title: Re: Automatic Gearbox check valve breaking
Post by: rusty747 on June 24, 2019, 21:45:11

ECS Tuning showing them as available at $92.
Good luck

Title: Re: Automatic Gearbox check valve breaking
Post by: Shvegel on June 25, 2019, 08:48:48

I have a spare gearbox in my attic.  I will see if it is the right one.  I know there is a split between early and late I am not sure where.  I should be able to  tell from the drawing.

Title: Re: Automatic Gearbox check valve breaking
Post by: stickandrudderman on June 25, 2019, 11:53:35

I have a good used one. Send me a message if interested.

Title: Re: Automatic Gearbox check valve breaking
Post by: Shvegel on June 25, 2019, 23:18:54

Colin is much closer.